Beach Hunters Review

Just joined the site recently and very dissapointed. First, there's really not that many hot girls. I like perky athletic college age and only found a small handful of them on there after searching for a couple hours. Second, the video and picture quality is awful. I was hoping after joining the site and having the ability to view full size pics etc it would improve over the free samples. But it did not. I see no reason at all to pay for this site when you can see much better stuff for free on the web.

I will not cover what the site and other others reviews have already touched on for BeachHunters, rather I will cover details, yet to be given, that I feel important that individuals should be aware of prior to considering membership to BeachHunters.com. Content Quantity. As of August, 2013 Beach Hunters indicates to non-members of amassing well over 8,700 "full-size" video clips. Now that may sound a lot, but wait, a great majority of these clips are actually found in 3 different formats (avi, mpg, mp4, wmv). What does that mean? Between 2002 and 2004, video clips were posted as a single formats, but during 2004, BeachHunters started posting their video updates in more than one format. (avi, mpg or wmv). So in short, what they are actually providing is 2 to 3 file types (mp4, wmv, avi) and/or sizes of the same content posted. So it's a safe bet if you divide their given number of "full-size"clips by 3, it’ll actually estimate less than 3,000 "full-size" clips of actual content. Nonetheless, this is still a fairly impressive number of videos; until it's let on to the newcomers that their video clips are predominately less than a minute long, (majority of nudism clips lasting less than 30 seconds) segmented editions from much longer gathered footage. The majority of content that last more than a minute in length, fall under the “Sex on the Beach” category, ranging from a mere 2 minutes majority to a decent 20 minutes in length (not many this length). Content Quality. As for BeachHunters.com well over 240,000 photos posted on site, they are all in actuality, simply low-resolution captures of video content, nothing more than that, sad to say. As for video quality, it ranges from the incredibly low (why even bother posting) resolution of 320x256 to (what should be the standard of current updated material) resolution of 1280X720. Also while browsing through content, I notice these guys pretty much will video tape anything that has tits and ass...no scruples in what they're shooting, which gives the site a huge range in different body types and ages of women on their site. Despite the site's grossly misleading quantity and quality of content, they still have quite a bit voyeur material to chew on. In short, I wouldn't bother with more than a month membership with these guys, in one sitting, then perhaps hit them up again in a year or 2 later, when hopefully their quality of content has further indicate improvement.