SCORE
N/ALike:
Don't Like:
We may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through our links. It is how you support this site–thank you!
Bed Fellow was a name with which I found myself familiar, or so I thought. In the end, I couldn't find any reference to its existence as a print publication. In the end, who really cares whether such a thing exists as long as the online publication is up to code.
I was hoping to be able to give an unqualified yes, but as seems to be the case lately with so many gay sites I've seen I can only manage an answer as half-assed as the content offered. In other words, it's good, but it could be much better as yet another site decides that porn lovers want quantity over quality as if we're all indiscriminate size queens.
The current stars of BedFellow certainly do measure up to my stringent standards. They're all young twinks , although they do have a certain diversity within that limited genre, some looking a little more "street" than others, while others still look athletic, not just extremely tall and slim. These 177 guys each come with a set of photos, some high in quality, others small video captures, a streaming video and/or a great-quality downloadable MPEG. My main complaint is with the pictures since the resolution is just not up to my usual demands.
The same mediocre to average feedback can be said of the huge number of extra galleries, over 1,050 sets under four subcategories called Little Stars, Bunk Mates, Bad Apple and Collections (also contains a few videos among its photo sets). These photos contain loads of twinks, hardcore action and other types of men a bit older or possessing a different non-twink style in, again, photos that are medium-res unfortunately.
Other content includes 42 archived sets of high quality screen captures from live webcam performances from some Bed Fellow models, six professionally produced explicit ezines, seven full-access bonus sites with streaming content, a streaming video site with multiple DVD titles and 22 live and voyeur cam sites offering provocative content without additional fees.
Finally, there is a rather extensive X-rated video review guide. They advertise updates five days a week, but this includes outside links to the ezines and bonus sites. I would like to see higher-resolution pictures even if the price is competitive for the large amount of porn available.
Still having trouble?
Image Quality | N/A |
Usability | N/A |
Updates | N/A |
Content Amount | N/A |
Value | N/A |
Exclusivity | N/A |
Download / Streaming | N/A |
Features | N/A |
Bonus Material | N/A |
Rabbit Score | N/A |
User Comments