SCORE
N/ALike:
Don't Like:
We may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through our links. It is how you support this site–thank you!
Sexy, muscular dudes are forever, but usually you hope that the sites featuring them will change with the times. However, little has changed since we first reviewed Hot Guys Club back in August 2005. Although the site it still advertises various update schedules inside the members area, before you sign up it is very evident that it is no longer updating, because they tell you so on the join page.
HotGuysClub still, of course, suggests that you can join anyway to enjoy the existing content, but I beg to differ. There was never much to see in the first place. With nothing added to the original amount, the site is rather small.
There are seven videos to download and they're all nonexclusive. They are quite short, around six minutes. It's too bad that they aren't longer since they're pretty hot, depicting a mix of solo masturbation and hardcore gay sex, all enjoyed between cut and cute studs.
One of the vids is available as an MPEG and the other six come in Windows Media format. The quality varies, but most of them aren't very impressive. That said, at least one of them offers great-quality playback.
The 20 photo galleries are made up of images that are crisp and clear, but not high-res. They feature a mishmash of sexy men and there is no overall theme, since some are older and some not very old at all. The photos are mostly solo, but there is some sucking and fucking to be seen, as well as a couple of torrid threesomes .
There are 15 adult games and two streaming feeds included as extras. Before you give up the ghost, don't despair because the real treasure here lies in your access to the complete Bad Puppy network of gay sites . It's definitely worth following the link and reading the full review, because that site has tons of porn and even more extras.
Hot Guys Club is not nearly as hot as its studly stars. However, it does serve as a portal to something better for no extra cost when you factor in the bonus network, so it's not completely without merit.
Image Quality | N/A |
Usability | N/A |
Updates | N/A |
Content Amount | N/A |
Value | N/A |
Exclusivity | N/A |
Download / Streaming | N/A |
Features | N/A |
Bonus Material | N/A |
Rabbit Score | N/A |
Windows | 320x240; 1550K |
MPEG | 352x288; 812K |