Like:
Don't Like:
$3995
30 Days
Info This site is scored on its photo content—not videos!
We may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through our links. It is how you support this site–thank you!
When you think of elegance, does an image of Audrey Hepburn in her black "Breakfast at Tiffany's" outfit come to mind? If so, then the images of these chicks being bound and dominated on Restrained Elegance is far from what you had in mind. Nevertheless, this site and its content are nothing short of graceful.
In the scene I checked out, a naked, blonde bombshell sits in the middle of a round cage. Both above and below the enclosure are numerous candles waiting to be lit by her Master. First he blindfolds her, then he lights the candles and expects her to feed him dessert before she can get away from the hot, red wax. Scenarios like this are standard on RestrainedElegance.
The bulk of the content comes in the form of 1006 sets of pictures. They're all sharp and clear, but some are larger than others. Not to worry, though, because even if the images vary in size, they all qualify as high-res and you can save your favorites in Zip files.
The galleries are filled with glamorous shots of chicks all tied up. Okay, in one set, the model is only handcuffed, but she is naked. Moreover, she moves around, so you get a variety of poses from her and it's hot watching her try to get comfortable. Most of the time rope is used and sometimes the girls are also gagged.
There are also 121 videos. You can download each one and there are various formats on offer, with the most recent providing Full HD MP4 files. Sometimes a video has the bound babe describing how she feels about being the proverbial damsel in distress. I find it unique, because usually the interviews are before and/or after the bondage session rather than during.
You'll also find scenes with some kind of storyline that, for example, explains why the girl is being punished. And from what I've seen, the acting isn't half bad. Then again, maybe it helps that the actors have British accents, which somehow makes even the most unlikely lines believable.
As far as updating goes, they add four new photo sets and one new video each week. I should also explain that I found fewer videos this time around. Apparently it's because the older footage gets taken offline and is then put back in the archive section. There are two archive updates each day, so it will take a while for all the content to come back online.
The words "restrained elegance" refers to a tasteful expression rather than an ostentatious display of style and wealth, which seems apropos here, because the scenes don't necessarily involve sleek, high-end productions, but have good production values, often conveying a simple form of glamour. All in all, Restrained Elegance easily earns my recommendation.
Or view more BDSM Porn Sites
Are downloads included?
No. Downloads are not available at this time.
Payment Methods
Image Quality | 10/15 |
Usability | 5/10 |
Updates | 7/10 |
Content Amount | 13/15 |
Value | 7/10 |
Exclusivity | 20/20 |
Download / Streaming | 5/5 |
Features | 2/5 |
Bonus Material | 4/10 |
Rabbit Score | 75% |
MP4 | 1920x1080; 5653K |
MP4 | 640x360; 1492K; Streaming |
RM | 720x540; 1059K |
Windows | 720x540; 1024K |
User Comments
By Morello on Mar 5, 2013
On the whole, good quality photos of very attractive girls in various types of bondage. The sets often lack imagination. The first photo is ok, but it doesn't go anywhere, so you just end up with 30 versions of the same photo from a slightly different angle. They could show stages of the bondage being applied, maybe have the girl gradually being stripped during the set. Sometimes they do, but most times it is just very similar pictures being repeated. I haven't visited the site for a while, so I was surprised to see so many sets I downloaded 3 years ago are on the site claiming to have been added weeks ago.
0
By chuffer on Dec 26, 2012
This site has gone from great to okay to terrible in the space of 3 years. the same thing over and over as updates, the producers of the site appear to be so far up their own rectum thus all they care about is the resolution and large file sizes they are throwing up, not the actual quality of whats happening. Basically, once you've seen 2 or 3 videos from the site, you have seen EVERY single one. At least a few years ago they tried. couldn't agree more with the reviews posted before me. sure there is nothing else like it on the web, but there is a reason for that, a site name change to Repetitively Restrained - it should be called.
0