SCORE
N/ALike:
Don't Like:
We may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through our links. It is how you support this site–thank you!
I can imagine with the number of adult websites out there that coming up with a URL for a new site would be pretty hard. That fact is made evident when you get a site called Tight II Def. It isn't so much the fact that the name won't make sense to everyone, but more so that it isn't even pronounced like it is spelled. TightIIDef puts two letter I's in the middle of it but the people on the site pronounce it like the number 2. Why not just use the number two? Unfortunately this was only the beginning of the problems I had with the site.
They call themselves an amateur ethnic site, but 99% of the babes on Tight II Def are black, and the other 1% I saw were white. They also say that TightIIDef "is the place where you see all those ladies you just saw at the nightclub or bachelor party from last night." This part is true. These booty-shaking sistahs are true amateurs and while some look like strippers, others look like that chubby chick from the club who was shaking her ass all over every guy she could.
The content itself feels like a mish-mash of stuff. I randomly checked out about 10 video clips and I got a bit of everything: from strippers on stage and hardcore fucking, to lesbian action and night vision club fun. The problem is that none of it is that exciting, because of either the action or the quality of the scene itself.
The hardcore fucking clips I watched could have been good, but the performers had no idea how to fuck for the camera and the camera work itself was awful, either getting in to close or filming at a bad angle. The lesbian episode I watched was filmed better, but the quality of the video was so poor it wasn't worth it. The best scenes I saw were the stripper ones, because they at least gave me a nice view of the gal doing her dance and shaking her thing. Not only was there a lot of variety of content, but the quality was also all over the place. Everything is downloadable in Windows Media format, but I must have scene about 6 different quality numbers, ranging from poor to good (320x240, 200-808kbps).
So far there are 57 models available and 21 of them have video content as well as picture sets. In total there are about 120 photo sets and 31 vids. These numbers are ok, but considering that the quality of the content isn't all that great and there is no bonus content available I don't see Tight II Def being worth the 25 bucks a month they are asking.
Image Quality | N/A |
Usability | N/A |
Updates | N/A |
Content Amount | N/A |
Value | N/A |
Exclusivity | N/A |
Download / Streaming | N/A |
Features | N/A |
Bonus Material | N/A |
Rabbit Score | N/A |
Windows | 320x240; 747K; Streaming |