SCORE
N/ALike:
Don't Like:
We may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through our links. It is how you support this site–thank you!
Yes, I know. Assuming To Dirty is trying to imply that the girls and the scenes are really dirty - and maybe even dirtier than we can handle - then, yes, you're right, they should've used "too" rather than "to." However, any spelling/grammar issues aside, let us check out the more important factors of a site. Starting with the design and navigation.
ToDirty scores well on both those counts. The site looks good and I had no issues browsing the collection. There's a "the scenes" section, a model index and keyword tags with every scene, so you can quickly filter out something a little more specific. Unfortunately, nothing is dated.
This isn't a huge deal in the grand scheme of things, but in this case the site isn't very big, so not knowing how often they update can put a little bit of hesitancy in anyone thinking of joining. As for the amount of content, there are currently 33 videos and 33 photo sets.
The site has confirmed with us that currently half the collection is exclusive, but that going forward they will only be updating with exclusive scenes, so the percentage of nonexclusive ones will become smaller and smaller over time (this also seems to imply they're updating, which is a good sign).
As for the scenes themselves, they're pretty standard hardcore fare often featuring pornstars you'll probably be familiar with (Katja Kassin, Sasha Grey and Holly Morgan, to name a few). No story lines or reality setups here. Just hardcore fucking, throat-gagging, anal -slamming and face-cumming.
The videos can be downloaded in good-quality MP4 files (despite them claiming to have "dirty girls captured in HD") and there's also the option to stream them in an embedded Flash player (although I was getting a player error when I tried to stream them, so let's hope that gets fixed soon). The photos are high-res images, but no Zip files.
The action on the site is good and dirty (not "to" or "too" dirty). However, you can find this kind of content all over the place online, so I just don't see it being worth it yet, especially given its current size and the fact that not everything is exclusive.
Image Quality | N/A |
Usability | 3/10 |
Updates | N/A |
Content Amount | N/A |
Value | N/A |
Exclusivity | N/A |
Download / Streaming | N/A |
Features | N/A |
Bonus Material | N/A |
Rabbit Score | N/A |
MP4 | 800x600; 2047K |
Flash | ; K; Streaming |